iShares Latin America 40 ETF (ILF) — Technical state

As of 2026-10-15 — re-computed nightly across the coverage universe. Closelooknet diary readings, not advice.

Uptrend stack intact

Trades +5.3% vs the 50-day and +6.4% vs the 200-day average, 3.2% below the 52-week high and +37.3% off the 52-week low. Computed from daily closes.

The moving-average stack

vs 20-day+3.1%
vs 50-day+5.3%
vs 200-day+6.4%
52-week band3.2% off the high · +37.3% off the low
Streak3 consecutive down sessions
50-day crossprice crossed up through the 50-day 9 sessions ago
Stochastic%K 76.1 · %D 89.5

Continue: the ILF chart & overview · the signal board

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-15

Quick answers

What is the current Closelooknet signal on ILF?

Uptrend stack intact — Trades +5.3% vs the 50-day and +6.4% vs the 200-day average, 3.2% below the 52-week high and +37.3% off the 52-week low. Computed from daily closes. As of 2026-10-15; the signal board re-computes across the coverage universe nightly. A research diary reading, not advice.

Is ILF above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages?

As of 2026-10-15, iShares Latin America 40 ETF trades +5.3% above its 50-day and +6.4% above its 200-day average, with the 20-day +3.1% away.

How far is ILF from its 52-week high?

3.2% below the 52-week high and 37.3% above the 52-week low, as of 2026-10-15.

Mentioned on Closelooknet

Where ILF appears in the diary — 2 pieces, newest first. Every link is our own writing.

Dailies

Portfolios — No Trades as Chips Fell 5%Daily Pulse · 10 Oct 2026Global ETFs logged nothing, which makes twelve weeks in a row without a trade; its Korea fund EWY fell 7.6 percent and its Latin America fund ILF rose 9.1 percent.
One Core, Three Countries: The Global ETF Book RebuiltDaily Pulse · 11 Jul 2026Gold, bitcoin and Latin America were not touched — GLD, IBIT and ILF carry on unchanged.