—

Market X-Ray · Toolbox 7

Market-Structure Anomaly Score

A single weak ratio is a normal alert. This asks the higher-level question: is today's whole combination of internals — participation, concentration, credit, size and factor/beta — historically unusual? It scores the standardised multivariate distance of today's configuration against the engine's own ~3-year history. This is the 63-day structural lens — distinct from the short-term cracks on the Regime page.

Updated daily · data as of 2026-09-23

87 th pct
high Mega-cap dependency anomaly Bearish warning Lifecycle: New · rising — 87th now vs 61th 5d ago

Today's market structure reads high — 87th percentile of abnormality, the signature of a mega-cap dependency anomaly. The anomaly is driven mostly by small-cap and concentration and high-beta. A firm headline index sitting over soft internals is an unusual, narrow configuration. It describes how the advance is built — narrow leadership can and often does keep trending — so read it as structure, not a timing signal. It has only just flagged.

What drives it — five dimensions

Each internal dimension's recent move, standardised against its own history (z). The anomaly is the multivariate distance — how far today's whole vector sits from the norm, not any single dimension.

Breadth z -0.90

narrowing to the mega-caps

Concentration z -1.37

mega-cap concentration rising

Credit z +0.10

near its norm

Small-cap z -2.23

small caps lagging

High-beta z +1.11

high-beta leading (risk-on)

Statistical context

Abnormality87th pct
For this regime89th pct
Distance · Mahalanobis1.35
Shrinkage λ0.05
History720bars

How to read it

Five internal dimensions — breadth (RSP/SPY), concentration (ex-Mag-7/SPY), credit (HYG/LQD), small-cap (IWM/SPY) and factor/beta (SPHB/SPLV) — are each measured as a recent ratio move and standardised against ~3 years of their own history. The anomaly is the Mahalanobis distance across all five: how far today's combined configuration sits from its norm given how these internals normally co-move. A divergence between dimensions that usually move together — say small-caps rising while breadth narrows — therefore reads as more unusual than either move alone, while a shared move counts once rather than several times. The quadratic form decomposes additively, so each dimension's contribution % is its correlation-aware share of the distance; the covariance is shrunk toward the identity (Schäfer–Strimmer λ) for stability. Direction flags whether the abnormality is a firm-index-over-weak-internals warning or an improving-internals recovery; lifecycle tracks whether it is new, worsening, persisting or resolving. The percentile self-recalibrates to the metric, but the 50/70/85/95 bands remain uncalibrated pending backtest — directional, not exact.

For information and discussion only — a reading of market internals, not investment advice. Feeds the Daily Read; pairs with Regime Baselines and the Cross-Toolbox Alert Stack.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-23

Quick answers

What does the Market-Structure Anomaly Score measure?

It asks whether today’s whole combination of market internals — participation, concentration, credit, small-caps and factor/beta — is historically unusual, not whether any single ratio is weak. The score is the standardised multivariate (Mahalanobis) distance of today’s configuration against the engine’s own roughly three-year history.

What is the Anomaly Score right now?

As of 2026-09-23, the Anomaly Score sits at the 87th percentile, labeled "high" and classified as a "Mega-cap dependency anomaly" type, direction "Bearish warning".

Which dimension is driving the anomaly the most?

As of 2026-09-23, Small-cap contributes the largest share of the distance at 67%, with a z-score of -2.23.

What is the current lifecycle status of the anomaly?

As of 2026-09-23, the anomaly’s lifecycle status is "New" (trend: rising).