- Ratio-Quality84 Micro-Cap Breadth falling on IWC weakness — IWC dropping faster than IWM, a high-quality warning.
- Divergence81 SPY has risen over 21 days while IWM/SPY has not confirmed (+8.7% gap) — Large-cap strength is not confirmed by small-cap participation.
- Breadth72 Headline index strength is not confirmed by internal participation.
- Breadth72 Market participation is severely narrow — headline strength concentrated in a small group of leaders.
- Ratio-Quality68 Small Growth Breadth falling on IWO weakness — IWO dropping faster than IWN, a high-quality warning.
- Ratio-Quality66 Credit Breadth falling on HYG weakness — HYG dropping faster than LQD, a high-quality warning.
- Divergence65 SPY has risen over 21 days while MDY/SPY has not confirmed (+5% gap) — Mid-caps are not confirming large-cap strength.
- Divergence53 SPY has risen over 63 days while RSP/SPY has not confirmed (+7.1% gap) — S&P 500 headline strength is not confirmed by the average (equal-weight) stock.
- Divergence51 QQQ has risen over 63 days while QQQE/QQQ has not confirmed (+7.1% gap) — Nasdaq-100 strength is not confirmed by the average Nasdaq stock.
- Divergence48 SPY has risen over 63 days while XMAG/SPY has not confirmed (+6.4% gap) — The index is rising without the 493 stocks outside the Mag-7.
- Divergence48 SPY has risen over 63 days while SPXT/SPY has not confirmed (+6.9% gap) — Non-tech S&P 500 is not keeping pace with the headline.
- Divergence42 QQQ has risen over 63 days while QNXT/QTOP has not confirmed (+6% gap) — The lower 70 Nasdaq-100 names are not confirming the top 30.
Market X-Ray · Toolbox 6 · Cross-Toolbox Scoring
Market Structure Alert Stack
Four toolboxes — Beta-Instability, Breadth-of-Breadth, Ratio-Quality and the Divergence Scanner — each raise their own alerts. On their own they're noise. This layer asks the only question that matters: do they agree? It clusters every alert by what it implies for the market and scores each cluster by how many independent tools confirm it — turning dozens of isolated signals into one ranked stack and a single Master Risk Score.
Updated daily · data as of 2026-10-15
The stack — ranked, confirmed clusters
- Divergence58 SPY has risen over 21 days while XLI/XLU has not confirmed (+4.4% gap) — Industrials are not outperforming utilities — a late-cycle tone.
- Divergence53 SPY has risen over 21 days while XLY/XLP has not confirmed (+4.1% gap) — Discretionary is not outperforming staples — a cautious consumer.
- Divergence87 SPY is up over 21d but breadth momentum is rolling over — The S&P is rising while the Breadth-of-Breadth score is deteriorating — participation momentum is rolling over beneath the index.
- Divergence86 SMH is up over 21d but the move is inefficient (choppy) — Semis are higher but on a noisy, low-efficiency path — leadership without clean momentum.
- Divergence81 SPY is up over 21d but the move is inefficient (choppy) — The S&P is higher but the move is inefficient — a choppy, low-quality grind rather than a clean trend.
- Divergence63 QQQ has risen over 63 days while SMH/XLK has not confirmed (+12.6% gap) — Semis — the cycle tell — are not confirming Nasdaq strength.
- Divergence56 XLK has risen over 21 days while AIQ/XLK has not confirmed (+4.3% gap) — The AI basket is not confirming broad-tech leadership.
- Divergence87 SPY is rising over 21d while IWM/SPY upside participation is fading — The S&P is rising but small-caps’ upside (up-day) beta is fading — they are not capturing the advance.
- Divergence64 SPY is rising over 21d while IWM/SPY downside beta is rising — Small-cap downside beta is rising while the index holds — latent fragility beneath a stable tape.
- Divergence50 SMH is rising over 21d while SMH/XLK upside participation is fading — Semis are rising but their upside beta to broad tech is fading — leadership quality is exhausting.
- Beta46 IGV/XLK: neutral — upside-beta collapse, early beta improvement, downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Divergence45 SPY is rising over 21d while HYG/SPY upside participation is fading — Equities are rising but high-yield credit’s upside beta is fading — credit isn’t capturing the risk-on.
- Beta45 IWM/SPY: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, beta-adjusted underperformance, upside participation deteriorating (sharp), downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Beta43 XMAG/SPY: neutral — beta-adjusted underperformance
- Beta42 ARKK/QQQ: neutral — beta-adjusted underperformance, downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Beta41 XSD/SPY: neutral — downside-beta expansion, upside participation deteriorating (sharp), downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Beta34 XSD/QQQ: fragile — downside-beta expansion, negative beta asymmetry, upside participation deteriorating (sharp)
- Beta33 QQQE/QQQ: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, beta-adjusted underperformance
- Beta32 QTOP/QQQ: neutral — downside-beta expansion
- Beta31 QNXT/QQQ: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, early beta improvement
- Beta25 MDY/SPY: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, beta-adjusted underperformance, upside participation deteriorating (sharp)
- Beta23 RSP/SPY: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, beta-adjusted underperformance, upside participation deteriorating (sharp)
- Beta21 SMH/QQQ: fragile — downside-beta expansion, negative beta asymmetry, upside participation deteriorating (sharp)
- Beta19 SPXT/SPY: neutral — upside-beta collapse, negative beta asymmetry, early beta improvement, upside participation deteriorating (sharp), downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Beta16 SMH/XLK: fragile — downside-beta expansion, negative beta asymmetry, beta-adjusted underperformance, downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Beta6 HYG/SPY: neutral — upside-beta collapse, beta-adjusted underperformance, downside-beta expansion (sharp)
- Divergence43 SPY has risen over 63 days while SPY/RSP has not confirmed (+7.1% gap) — The S&P advance is becoming more dependent on the cap-weighted mega-caps.
- Divergence42 QQQ has risen over 63 days while QQQ/QQQE has not confirmed (+7.1% gap) — Nasdaq gains are concentrating in the largest names.
- Divergence39 QQQ has risen over 63 days while QTOP/QNXT has not confirmed (+6% gap) — The top-30 Nasdaq names are increasingly carrying the index.
How to read it
Every toolbox's alerts are normalised into one schema and mapped to a market implication (narrowing, risk-off, leadership exhaustion, hidden fragility, broadening…). Alerts that imply the same thing form a cluster, scored by the spec blend: base severity (0.25), toolbox confirmation (0.20, how many of the four agree), independence (0.15, distinct evidence types — price vs beta vs breadth vs credit), regime relevance (0.15), persistence (0.10), worsening (0.10) and importance (0.05). A cluster confirmed by three independent tools is a high-conviction read; one tool alone is a watch item. The Master Risk Score tracks the top cluster, lifted when several distinct bearish clusters fire at once.
For information and discussion only — a reading of market internals, not investment advice. Thresholds are uncalibrated pending the planned backtest. Built on Beta-Instability, Breadth-of-Breadth, Ratio-Quality and the Divergence Scanner.
FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-15
Quick answers
What does the Market Structure Alert Stack show?
It fuses alerts from four independent Market X-Ray toolboxes — Beta-Instability, Breadth-of-Breadth, Ratio-Quality and the Divergence Scanner — into clusters by market implication, then scores each cluster by how many of the four tools confirm it. The result is one Master Market-Structure Risk Score and a ranked, de-duplicated alert stack.
What is the Master Market-Structure Risk Score right now?
As of 2026-10-15, the Master Market-Structure Risk Score is 74, labeled "high".
How many alert clusters are confirmed by multiple toolboxes?
As of 2026-10-15, 2 of 5 alert clusters are confirmed by two or more toolboxes, out of 41 raw alerts across all four tools.
How is a cluster’s score calculated?
Each cluster blends base severity (25%), toolbox confirmation (20%, how many of the four tools agree), independence of evidence (15%), regime relevance (15%), persistence (10%), worsening (10%) and importance (5%). A cluster confirmed by three independent tools reads as high-conviction; one tool alone is a watch item.