CellaVision AB (CEVI.ST) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-08-26 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

57 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 55
Quality 69
Growth 27
Balance sheet 79
Cash quality 57
Capital allocation 59
Momentum 62

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

14.06 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

8/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.55 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the CEVI.ST chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-26

Quick answers

What is CellaVision AB's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 57/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-08-26: valuation 55, quality 69, growth 27, balance sheet 79, cash quality 57, capital allocation 59, momentum 62. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is CellaVision AB's Altman Z-Score?

14.06, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-08-26. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is CellaVision AB's Piotroski F-Score?

8 of 9, as of 2026-08-26. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does CellaVision AB's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.55 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-08-26. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.