—
C+
C+ The full Closelook — membership. Open the C+ overview

Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc (GFL) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-24 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

35 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.13 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

8/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.17 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the GFL chart & overview · the earnings record

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-24

Quick answers

What is Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 35/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-24: valuation 24, quality 16, growth 37, balance sheet 16, cash quality 49, capital allocation 75, momentum 55. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc's Altman Z-Score?

1.13, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-24. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc's Piotroski F-Score?

8 of 9, as of 2026-09-24. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Gfl Environmental Holdings Inc's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.17 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-24. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Waste Management, then Industrials. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.