Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-08-26 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

47 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 95
Quality 45
Growth 22
Balance sheet 28
Cash quality 38
Capital allocation 76
Momentum 36

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.17 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

4/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.48 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the CAP.PA chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-26

Quick answers

What is Capgemini SE's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 47/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-08-26: valuation 95, quality 45, growth 22, balance sheet 28, cash quality 38, capital allocation 76, momentum 36. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Capgemini SE's Altman Z-Score?

2.17, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-08-26. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Capgemini SE's Piotroski F-Score?

4 of 9, as of 2026-08-26. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Capgemini SE's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.48 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-08-26. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.