Capgemini SE (CAP.PA) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-08-06 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

46 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 94
Quality 38
Growth 25
Balance sheet 31
Cash quality 36
Capital allocation 77
Momentum 31

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.12 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

4/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.48 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the CAP.PA chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-06

Quick answers

What is Capgemini SE's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 46/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-08-06: valuation 94, quality 38, growth 25, balance sheet 31, cash quality 36, capital allocation 77, momentum 31. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Capgemini SE's Altman Z-Score?

2.12, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-08-06. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Capgemini SE's Piotroski F-Score?

4 of 9, as of 2026-08-06. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Capgemini SE's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.48 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-08-06. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.