Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Aug 20, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

1.011.181.35 25-0925-1226-0326-06 1.28
1D -0.22%1W +0.33%1M +16.28%1Y +25.05%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-0925-1226-0326-06 66.89
Close 66.89 to 69.50 +3.90% to 62.56 -6.47% to ~56 -16.28%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D -1.28%1W -2.07%1M +6.89%1Y +25.86%
1Y vs QQQ: +0.38%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D -1.07%1W -2.39%1M -8.07%1Y +0.65%
1Y vs QQQ: -24.83%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D -0.33%1W -3.75%1M +2.26%1Y +23.63%
1Y vs QQQ: -1.85%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D -1.21%1W -9.06%1M +12.90%1Y -38.97%
1Y vs QQQ: -64.45%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Aug 20, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 481.15 -0.47%-2.98%+23.26%-5.07% -30.55% -19.45% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 260.11 -2.16%-1.89%+6.23%+14.08% -11.40% -0.30% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 340.67 -1.17%-1.64%-0.42%+69.39% +43.91% +55.01% print record
META Consumer-AI 545.83 -0.04%-8.26%-12.97%-27.20% -52.68% -41.58% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 311.30 -1.75%+1.98%-4.48%+35.28% +9.80% +20.90% print record
NVDA Supplier 216.85 -0.33%-3.75%+2.26%+23.63% -1.85% +9.25% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 142.07 1D -1.21% · 1W -9.06% · 1M +12.90% · 1Y -38.97%
Below the Sep-2025 high -56.24% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 61.1% cohort median 47.1% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 710.93 -0.72%-2.89%+0.79%+25.48%
SPY 762.60 -0.84%-1.96%+2.03%+20.51%
SOXX 522.35 +0.52%-5.15%-5.97%+114.07%
XLK 183.10 -0.29%-4.02%+1.57%+40.71%
IGV 101.91 -0.88%-4.11%+14.48%-4.36%
MAGS · the foil 66.89 -1.14%-2.34%+0.89%+14.38%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelook data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelook publishes research, not investment advice.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-08-20

Quick answers

What does Mag Pulse track?

Mag Pulse is a daily board on six "Mag" companies split into three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL) and Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle tracked separately as a high-beta "torque" name. Tesla is excluded by methodology: its price is driven by autonomy and robotics narratives, not cloud/AI build-out economics. See the Capex Cliff 101 for the thesis behind the board. As of Aug 20, 2026.

How has the Hyperscalers-versus-Consumer-AI ratio moved over the past year?

As of Aug 20, 2026, the equal-weight Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI ratio moved +25.05% over the trailing year (1D -0.22%, 1M +16.28%). A rising ratio means the market is paying the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort — the board's regime-turn detector.

Which of the Six has performed best and worst over the past year?

As of Aug 20, 2026, the strongest 1-year performer among the Six is GOOGL at +69.39%, and the weakest is META at -27.20%.

Where does MAGS trade relative to its key levels?

MAGS closed at 66.89 as of Aug 20, 2026, which is +3.90% from the 69.50 supply shelf, -6.47% from the 62.56 pivot, and -16.28% from the ~56 trendline.

How volatile is ORCL relative to the rest of the cohort?

As of Aug 20, 2026, ORCL's one-month realized volatility was 61.1%, versus a cohort median of 47.1% — the most volatile seat at the table. ORCL is -56.24% below its Sep-2025 high of 324.63 (set 2025-09-10).