—

Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Oct 16, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

1.011.181.34 25-1126-0226-0526-08 1.07
1D -1.02%1W -3.83%1M -2.22%1Y +0.29%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-1126-0226-0526-08 71.28
Close 71.28 to 69.50 -2.50% to 62.56 -12.23% to ~56 -21.44%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D -2.17%1W -3.09%1M +0.42%1Y +20.68%
1Y vs QQQ: +2.26%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D -1.16%1W +0.76%1M +2.70%1Y +20.33%
1Y vs QQQ: +1.91%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D -1.43%1W -6.61%1M -2.38%1Y +19.23%
1Y vs QQQ: +0.81%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D -4.64%1W -9.31%1M -14.85%1Y -57.51%
1Y vs QQQ: -75.93%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Oct 16, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 529.05 -1.93%-1.13%+6.29%+3.47% -14.95% -9.63% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 250.00 -1.87%-4.74%-0.47%+15.97% -2.45% +2.87% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 340.59 -2.47%-3.15%-1.94%+35.86% +17.44% +22.76% print record
META Consumer-AI 709.33 -3.72%-1.30%+4.04%-0.98% -19.40% -14.08% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 343.46 +0.43%+2.03%+1.92%+38.01% +19.59% +24.91% print record
NVDA Supplier 214.13 -1.43%-6.61%-2.38%+19.23% +0.81% +6.13% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 128.23 1D -4.64% · 1W -9.31% · 1M -14.85% · 1Y -57.51%
Below the Sep-2025 high -60.50% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 56% cohort median 24% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 709.80 -2.50%-5.52%-0.89%+18.42%
SPY 763.25 -1.11%-1.97%+0.33%+15.98%
SOXX 493.39 -4.14%-11.80%-4.95%+72.08%
XLK 183.47 -3.02%-7.70%-2.33%+29.73%
IGV 104.34 -4.80%-7.39%-1.36%-7.88%
MAGS · the foil 71.28 -1.97%-3.38%+0.71%+13.10%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelooknet data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelooknet publishes research, not investment advice.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-16

Quick answers

What does Mag Pulse track?

Mag Pulse is a daily board on six "Mag" companies split into three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL) and Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle tracked separately as a high-beta "torque" name. Tesla is excluded by methodology: its price is driven by autonomy and robotics narratives, not cloud/AI build-out economics. See the Capex Cliff 101 for the thesis behind the board. As of Oct 16, 2026.

How has the Hyperscalers-versus-Consumer-AI ratio moved over the past year?

As of Oct 16, 2026, the equal-weight Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI ratio moved +0.29% over the trailing year (1D -1.02%, 1M -2.22%). A rising ratio means the market is paying the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort — the board's regime-turn detector.

Which of the Six has performed best and worst over the past year?

As of Oct 16, 2026, the strongest 1-year performer among the Six is AAPL at +38.01%, and the weakest is META at -0.98%.

Where does MAGS trade relative to its key levels?

MAGS closed at 71.28 as of Oct 16, 2026, which is -2.50% from the 69.50 supply shelf, -12.23% from the 62.56 pivot, and -21.44% from the ~56 trendline.

How volatile is ORCL relative to the rest of the cohort?

As of Oct 16, 2026, ORCL's one-month realized volatility was 56%, versus a cohort median of 24% — the most volatile seat at the table. ORCL is -60.50% below its Sep-2025 high of 324.63 (set 2025-09-10).