—

Mag Pulse · daily board · the Six plus the Torque · as of Nov 9, 2026

Mag Pulse

One question, answered daily: is the hyperscaler cohort turning? The Mag complex spent ~19 months going sideways on capex fear while nearly every benchmark ran. This week's cloud prints put booked demand against that fear — this board keeps the score. Six names in three cohorts, one torque row, and the popular instrument (MAGS) as the shared price frame. Tesla is excluded by methodology.

The regime-turn line Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI · equal-weight · indexed 1y

0.951.111.26 25-1226-0326-0626-09 0.99
1D -1.17%1W +1.64%1M -5.86%1Y -11.06%

Rising = the market pays the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort. The line is the board's headline read: a durable turn here is what "the discount is closing" looks like in price.

The MAGS map popular-instrument foil · standing levels

69.50 shelf 62.56 pivot ~56 trend 25-1226-0326-0626-09 69.09
Close 69.09 to 69.50 +0.59% to 62.56 -9.45% to ~56 -18.95%

Ten-month compression: flat top at the 69.50 supply shelf (two rejections), rising floor on the multi-year trendline (~56, hand-set monthly), pivot 62.56 = the Dec-2024 top on price. Levels first, story second.

The cohorts

Hyperscalers
1D +2.16%1W +6.08%1M -7.40%1Y +6.26%
1Y vs QQQ: -5.33%

MSFT · AMZN · GOOGL — the thesis longs: does the cohort close the gap?

Consumer-AI
1D +3.36%1W +4.37%1M -1.65%1Y +19.48%
1Y vs QQQ: +7.89%

META · AAPL — not yet in the build-out cycle; edge-AI optionality

Supplier
1D -4.27%1W -11.58%1M -22.07%1Y -4.88%
1Y vs QQQ: -16.47%

NVDA — the anchor between build-out and deployment

Torque
1D +3.18%1W +0.48%1M -15.28%1Y -50.56%
1Y vs QQQ: -62.15%

ORCL — highest-beta hyperscaler pivot; thesis amplifier both ways

The Six absolute + relative, Nov 9, 2026 close

Name Cohort Close 1D1W1M1Y 1Y vs QQQ 1Y vs MAGS Record
MSFT Hyperscalers 545.18 +2.75%+7.51%+1.89%+10.13% -1.46% +4.22% print record
AMZN Hyperscalers 266.93 +2.94%+8.67%+1.71%+9.83% -1.76% +3.92% print record
GOOGL Hyperscalers 288.15 +1.18%+3.28%-18.06%+1.33% -10.26% -4.58% print record
META Consumer-AI 641.37 +5.12%+5.71%-10.76%+3.80% -7.79% -2.11% print record
AAPL Consumer-AI 350.69 +2.43%+3.66%+4.17%+30.24% +18.65% +24.33% print record
NVDA Supplier 178.67 -4.27%-11.58%-22.07%-4.88% -16.47% -10.79% print record

The Torque · ORCL separated by design — the thesis amplifier, both ways

Close 119.79 1D +3.18% · 1W +0.48% · 1M -15.28% · 1Y -50.56%
Below the Sep-2025 high -63.10% high 324.63 on 2025-09-10 — the deepest drawdown in the complex
1M realized vol 79.1% cohort median 44.7% — the most volatile seat at the table

The torque: hyperscaler-since-recently, declined the most, most volatile in both directions. If the thesis holds, the biggest move lives here.

Benchmarks the field the Six are measured against

Instrument Close 1D1W1M1Y
QQQ 679.35 +3.54%-0.26%-9.57%+11.59%
SPY 752.69 +2.37%+0.08%-3.32%+13.50%
SOXX 146.76 +7.49%-2.95%-21.29%+48.47%
XLK 170.88 +3.73%-1.92%-14.04%+18.80%
IGV 101.46 +2.61%-0.43%-9.95%-7.16%
MAGS · the foil 69.09 +2.31%+1.32%-6.34%+5.91%

The thesis layer the standing read per name — editorial, updated on evidence

MSFT

The capex-fear discount, refuted where it was priced deepest: Azure +43%, $678B backlog — the market paid the print +15% in a day.

AMZN

AWS re-accelerated to +37% — the demand witness. The biggest print reaction in its record parked it directly under the all-time-high line.

GOOGL

The straddle: cloud yes, search disruption already visible — and AI replacement monetizes less well. Re-rated in sympathy without printing.

META

Excellent at AI-for-ads — but that is not genAI. Charged hardest of the Six for strategy-push capex without a booked-demand anchor.

AAPL

Waiting to monetize reach, with the tail risk that a new AI interface takes reach away from mobile. The cost repricing hit its margin story first.

NVDA

The supplier both cohorts pay either way — priced on workloads, not orders; the boundary name between build-out and deployment.

Methodology

Universe: six Mag names in three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL), Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle as a visually separated torque row. Tesla is excluded by stated methodology: not a Mag company for this monitor — its price is set by autonomy and robotics narratives, not by the cloud/AI build-out economics this board measures.

Computation: cohort composites are equal-weight within cohort. All windows (1D/1W/1M/1Y) are trading-day windows on adjusted closes. Relatives are simple return differences against each benchmark (QQQ, SPY, SOXX, XLK, IGV) plus MAGS as the popular-instrument foil. The headline line is the hyperscaler composite divided by the consumer-AI composite, indexed over one year — the regime-turn detector.

The MAGS map is a standing frame, not a computed one: the 69.50 supply shelf and 62.56 pivot (the Dec-17-2024 top on price basis) are fixed levels; the multi-year trendline (~56) is hand-set and updated monthly.

Data: equities from the Closelooknet data lake; benchmark ETFs from EODHD. Refreshed nightly after the US close (22:30 UTC, Mon–Fri).

This board is a diary entry on our process. Closelooknet publishes research, not investment advice.

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-11-09

Quick answers

What does Mag Pulse track?

Mag Pulse is a daily board on six "Mag" companies split into three cohorts — Hyperscalers (MSFT, AMZN, GOOGL), Consumer-AI (META, AAPL) and Supplier (NVDA) — plus Oracle tracked separately as a high-beta "torque" name. Tesla is excluded by methodology: its price is driven by autonomy and robotics narratives, not cloud/AI build-out economics. See the Capex Cliff 101 for the thesis behind the board. As of Nov 9, 2026.

How has the Hyperscalers-versus-Consumer-AI ratio moved over the past year?

As of Nov 9, 2026, the equal-weight Hyperscalers ÷ Consumer-AI ratio moved -11.06% over the trailing year (1D -1.17%, 1M -5.86%). A rising ratio means the market is paying the build-out cohort over the consumer-AI cohort — the board's regime-turn detector.

Which of the Six has performed best and worst over the past year?

As of Nov 9, 2026, the strongest 1-year performer among the Six is AAPL at +30.24%, and the weakest is NVDA at -4.88%.

Where does MAGS trade relative to its key levels?

MAGS closed at 69.09 as of Nov 9, 2026, which is +0.59% from the 69.50 supply shelf, -9.45% from the 62.56 pivot, and -18.95% from the ~56 trendline.

How volatile is ORCL relative to the rest of the cohort?

As of Nov 9, 2026, ORCL's one-month realized volatility was 79.1%, versus a cohort median of 44.7% — the most volatile seat at the table. ORCL is -63.10% below its Sep-2025 high of 324.63 (set 2025-09-10).