Hermes International SCA (RMS.PA) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-30 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

53 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 30
Quality 84
Growth 38
Balance sheet 91
Cash quality 50
Capital allocation 41
Momentum 14

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

17.02 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

8/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-1.96 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the RMS.PA chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-30

Quick answers

What is Hermes International SCA's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 53/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-30: valuation 30, quality 84, growth 38, balance sheet 91, cash quality 50, capital allocation 41, momentum 14. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Hermes International SCA's Altman Z-Score?

17.02, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-10-30. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Hermes International SCA's Piotroski F-Score?

8 of 9, as of 2026-10-30. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Hermes International SCA's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-1.96 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-30. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

same Closelooknet index seat first, then Luxury Goods, then Consumer Cyclical. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.