—

Lazard Ltd (LAZ) — Technical state

As of 2026-11-04 — re-computed nightly across the coverage universe. Closelooknet diary readings, not advice.

The Closelooknet read

  • Signal: Recovery attempt under the 200-day — Trades +5.9% vs the 50-day and -7.1% vs the 200-day average, 30.1% below the 52-week high and +19.1% off the 52-week low. Computed from daily closes. (as of 2026-11-04)
  • Trend: Lazard Ltd trades 5.9% above its 50-day and 7.1% below its 200-day moving average. (as of 2026-11-04)

Lazard advises companies and governments on mergers, restructurings and capital raising through its Financial Advisory arm, and runs equity, fixed-income and alternative strategies through its Asset Management arm. Its advisory clients range from corporations and financial sponsors to sovereign and government bodies, spanning sectors from healthcare to energy to technology.

The full read — the desk's view, the earnings record, peers and the company snapshot — is on the LAZ overview. Research diary readings, not advice.

Recovery attempt under the 200-day

Trades +5.9% vs the 50-day and -7.1% vs the 200-day average, 30.1% below the 52-week high and +19.1% off the 52-week low. Computed from daily closes.

The moving-average stack

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-11-04

Quick answers

What is the current Closelooknet signal on LAZ?

Recovery attempt under the 200-day — Trades +5.9% vs the 50-day and -7.1% vs the 200-day average, 30.1% below the 52-week high and +19.1% off the 52-week low. Computed from daily closes. As of 2026-11-04; the signal board re-computes across the coverage universe nightly. A research diary reading, not advice.

Is LAZ above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages?

As of 2026-11-04, Lazard Ltd trades +5.9% above its 50-day and -7.1% below its 200-day average, with the 20-day +9.2% away.

How far is LAZ from its 52-week high?

30.1% below the 52-week high and 19.1% above the 52-week low, as of 2026-11-04.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Capital Markets. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.