—
C+
C+ The full Closelooknet — membership. Open the C+ overview

Ingram Micro Holding Corporation (INGM) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-08 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

51 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

3.20 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-22.13 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the INGM chart & overview · the earnings record

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-08

Quick answers

What is Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 51/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-08: valuation 71, quality 26, growth 65, balance sheet 44, cash quality 54, capital allocation 44, momentum 56. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's Altman Z-Score?

3.20, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-10-08. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-10-08. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Ingram Micro Holding Corporation's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-22.13 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-08. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Information Technology Services. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.