—
C+
C+ The full Closelook — membership. Open the C+ overview

Challenger Ltd (CGF.AU) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

51 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

5/8 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.78 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the CGF.AU chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Challenger Ltd's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 51/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 62, quality 55, growth 53, balance sheet 13, cash quality 55, capital allocation 49, momentum 74. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Challenger Ltd's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 8, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Challenger Ltd's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.78 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Insurance - Life, then Financial Services. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.