Koninklijke BAM Groep NV (BAMNB.AS) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

58 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 75
Quality 41
Growth 47
Balance sheet 57
Cash quality 57
Capital allocation 78
Momentum 68

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.53 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

8/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-0.89 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the BAMNB.AS chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 58/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 75, quality 41, growth 47, balance sheet 57, cash quality 57, capital allocation 78, momentum 68. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's Altman Z-Score?

2.53, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's Piotroski F-Score?

8 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Koninklijke BAM Groep NV's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-0.89 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.