—
C+
C+ The full Closelook — membership. Open the C+ overview

TPG Telecom Ltd (TPG.AU) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

40 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

0.38 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

7/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.00 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the TPG.AU chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is TPG Telecom Ltd's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 40/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 55, quality 33, growth 26, balance sheet 14, cash quality 77, capital allocation 50, momentum 47. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is TPG Telecom Ltd's Altman Z-Score?

0.38, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is TPG Telecom Ltd's Piotroski F-Score?

7 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does TPG Telecom Ltd's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.00 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Telecom Services. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.