Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF.TO) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-03 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

57 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 70
Quality 44
Growth 62
Balance sheet 49
Cash quality 21
Capital allocation 80
Momentum 76

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

0.36 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

0.16 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the SLF.TO chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-03

Quick answers

What is Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 57/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-03: valuation 70, quality 44, growth 62, balance sheet 49, cash quality 21, capital allocation 80, momentum 76. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Altman Z-Score?

0.36, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-03. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-09-03. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Beneish M-Score indicate?

0.16 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-03. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.