Secure Energy Services Inc. (SES.TO) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

43 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 31
Quality 28
Growth 34
Balance sheet 42
Cash quality 35
Capital allocation 77
Momentum 83

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.91 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

0.07 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the SES.TO chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Secure Energy Services Inc.'s Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 43/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 31, quality 28, growth 34, balance sheet 42, cash quality 35, capital allocation 77, momentum 83. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Secure Energy Services Inc.'s Altman Z-Score?

2.91, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Secure Energy Services Inc.'s Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Secure Energy Services Inc.'s Beneish M-Score indicate?

0.07 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Waste Management, then Industrials. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.