Puig Brands SA (PUIG.MC) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-17 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

44 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 59
Quality 53
Growth 28
Balance sheet 49
Cash quality 32
Capital allocation 26
Momentum 59

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.53 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.13 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the PUIG.MC chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-17

Quick answers

What is Puig Brands SA's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 44/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-17: valuation 59, quality 53, growth 28, balance sheet 49, cash quality 32, capital allocation 26, momentum 59. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Puig Brands SA's Altman Z-Score?

2.53, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-09-17. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Puig Brands SA's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-09-17. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Puig Brands SA's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.13 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-17. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.