Aurubis AG (NDA.DE) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-17 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

50 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 71
Quality 30
Growth 59
Balance sheet 70
Cash quality 28
Capital allocation 42
Momentum 39

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

4.36 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

6/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-1.89 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the NDA.DE chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-17

Quick answers

What is Aurubis AG's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 50/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-17: valuation 71, quality 30, growth 59, balance sheet 70, cash quality 28, capital allocation 42, momentum 39. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Aurubis AG's Altman Z-Score?

4.36, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-09-17. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Aurubis AG's Piotroski F-Score?

6 of 9, as of 2026-09-17. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Aurubis AG's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-1.89 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-17. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.