Infratil Ltd (IFT.AU) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-17 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

32 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 25
Quality 11
Growth 53
Balance sheet 11
Cash quality 10
Capital allocation 68
Momentum 61

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.06 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

4/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

1.96 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the IFT.AU chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-17

Quick answers

What is Infratil Ltd's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 32/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-17: valuation 25, quality 11, growth 53, balance sheet 11, cash quality 10, capital allocation 68, momentum 61. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Infratil Ltd's Altman Z-Score?

1.06, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-17. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Infratil Ltd's Piotroski F-Score?

4 of 9, as of 2026-09-17. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Infratil Ltd's Beneish M-Score indicate?

1.96 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-09-17. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.