—
C+
C+ The full Closelooknet — membership. Open the C+ overview

1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc (FLWS) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-19 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

30 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

2.02 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-3.72 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the FLWS chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-19

Quick answers

What is 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 30/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-10-19: valuation 60, quality 15, growth 20, balance sheet 21, cash quality 51, capital allocation 47, momentum 9. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc's Altman Z-Score?

2.02, which sits in the grey zone (1.81–2.99) as of 2026-10-19. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-10-19. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does 1-800 FLOWERS.COM Inc's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-3.72 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-10-19. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Specialty Retail, then Consumer Cyclical. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.