Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA (FCC.MC) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-18 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

49 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 62
Quality 38
Growth 55
Balance sheet 34
Cash quality 72
Capital allocation 47
Momentum 39

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.20 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.78 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the FCC.MC chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-18

Quick answers

What is Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 49/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-18: valuation 62, quality 38, growth 55, balance sheet 34, cash quality 72, capital allocation 47, momentum 39. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's Altman Z-Score?

1.20, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-18. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-09-18. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas SA's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.78 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-18. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelook universe

then Waste Management, then Industrials. Scored names rank on their Closelook score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.