Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL (ELPC) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-09-17 — refreshed nightly. Closelook readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelook module scores

51 /100 composite · 7 modules · general weight set

Valuation 78
Quality 37
Growth 46
Balance sheet 43
Cash quality 27
Capital allocation 74
Momentum 64

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

1.06 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the distress zone (below 1.81). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

5/9 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-2.72 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the ELPC chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-09-17

Quick answers

What is Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL's Closelook quality reading?

The composite reads 51/100 across 7 modules, as of 2026-09-17: valuation 78, quality 37, growth 46, balance sheet 43, cash quality 27, capital allocation 74, momentum 64. Closelook scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL's Altman Z-Score?

1.06, which sits in the distress zone (below 1.81) as of 2026-09-17. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL's Piotroski F-Score?

5 of 9, as of 2026-09-17. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-2.72 — below the −1.78 manipulation-risk threshold, as of 2026-09-17. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.