—
C+
C+ The full Closelooknet — membership. Open the C+ overview

DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA (DWS.DE) — Quality & forensics

As of 2026-10-05 — refreshed nightly. Closelooknet readings from an investment research diary, not ratings or advice.

The Closelooknet module scores

54 /100 composite · 6 modules · general weight set

Scores are computed nightly across the coverage universe and read relative to it — the methodology lives in the company-scoring explainer.

Financial forensics — the academic screens

3.46 Altman Z-Score

Sits in the safe zone (above 2.99). The Z-Score estimates financial-distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

7/8 Piotroski F-Score

Nine binary fundamental-strength checks across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

-1.56 Beneish M-Score

Screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk. A screen, not an accusation.

Continue: the DWS.DE chart & overview

FAQ · from the current data · as of 2026-10-05

Quick answers

What is DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA's Closelooknet quality reading?

The composite reads 54/100 across 6 modules, as of 2026-10-05: valuation 58, quality 68, growth 37, balance sheet 72, cash quality 26, capital allocation 58. Closelooknet scores are research diary readings, not ratings or investment advice.

What is DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA's Altman Z-Score?

3.46, which sits in the safe zone (above 2.99) as of 2026-10-05. The Altman Z-Score estimates financial distress risk from five balance-sheet and earnings ratios.

What is DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA's Piotroski F-Score?

7 of 8, as of 2026-10-05. The F-Score counts nine binary fundamental-strength signals across profitability, leverage and operating efficiency.

What does DWS Group GmbH & Co. KGaA's Beneish M-Score indicate?

-1.56 — above the −1.78 threshold the literature flags for earnings-manipulation risk, as of 2026-10-05. The M-Score screens reported earnings for statistical manipulation patterns; it is a screen, not an accusation.

Related in the Closelooknet universe

then Asset Management. Scored names rank on their Closelooknet score; names without one rank on trend state — above or below their 50- and 200-day averages — never on a score they do not carry.