C+

Daily Pulse · · macro · SMH

Digital artwork: on the left, the AI infrastructure side — server racks, a GPU card, memory chips and a silicon wafer dissolving into rising bar charts; a rotation ring and an upward arrow sweep through the center toward the right, where the AI-usage side appears — a friendly robot, dashboards, cloud icons, a tablet and a robotic arm. The capex side rotating toward the demand side.

Step One: Trimming the Infra-AI Side

This week was housekeeping with a direction. The discretionary work across the books was almost entirely in one direction — taking size down in semiconductors and the infrastructure side of the AI trade. Not a market call so much as sizing discipline, and step one of a posture.

The bottom line on why we reduced: the infrastructure-AI trade looks exhausted, and the negative divergences under the surface keep persisting — the index holds while the internals weaken, and our own divergence and breadth tools have been flagging it for weeks. When leadership tires and breadth won't confirm, the most-stretched, most-crowded names are the first place we take size off. For the deeper read — the capex-to-monetization bridge and the Z.ai repricing — see this week's Daily Look #099.

What we reduced: ASX, TSM, COHR, DDOG and NBIS in AI Build-Out; STM, TOELY, ATEYY and TSM in Global Tech 50; ASX in Hypergrowth. Trimmed, not exited — the theses are intact, the size wasn't. The Global ETFs book pared back too — out of EEM, SMHX and XMMO, reducing emerging-market, semiconductor-heavy and momentum-concentrated exposure so the book leans less on any single theme.

The buy side was small and deliberate. We opened KLIC and MKSI in AI Build-Out — selective adds in the equipment and process-control layer, the part of the build-out we still want exposure to even as we trim the crowded large-caps. And the Volatility Harvesting engine wrote one short put, on ALAB — the structure we use when we're happy to own a name lower while collecting premium in the meantime. That was the whole of the buy side; the rest of the tape was routine dividend reinvestment.

So: this week was almost all reductions — step one. The lean toward the demand, agentic-winner side is the next move, not this one: if the divergences keep persisting, that's where we add, on the setups, in size we can hold — possibly as soon as next week. We're not calling a top and not trading a headline; the rate question is still the senior signal and the trend hasn't broken. Probability, not prophecy. Three engines, one rulebook. No heroes.

The signals behind thisEach line links to the tool it comes from