C+

Worth a Read

Equities Priced a Peace Oil Hasn't

OnlyFin's May letter reads April's record equity run against a crude price that never got the ceasefire memo — a cross-asset divergence that is really a question about the regime.

Source: OnlyFin (Substack) Read the original →

OnlyFin's May letter reads April as a month when equities and oil told opposite stories. The S&P 500 ran from roughly 6,400 in late March to above 7,200 by month-end, closing at records, with the Magnificent Seven posting their best month on record — even as the conflict around Iran stayed unresolved. OnlyFin's point is that the rally has priced a peace that never arrived: crude, which spiked near $115, slid toward $80 and then rebounded back above $110, is still flagging the risk that equities have decided to wave away.

Underneath the tape, the letter flags stretched US valuations — a trailing price/earnings near 25x, on its read about 1.8 standard deviations above the ten-year mean — against China at under 10x, with the ten-year Treasury yield around 4.40% and core PCE still at 3.2%. Wilfred Lim's stance is cautious-constructive: still modestly long equities but pulling in risk, leaning into the tech rotation, China and commodities while trimming the mega-cap names where the crowd is most heavily positioned.

“The market has effectively priced two ceasefire scenarios that have not happened.”

OnlyFin

That is a regime question more than a stock question. When the index keeps printing records while the commodity that should fall on peace keeps climbing, both signals cannot be right — and the gap between them is the kind of cross-asset disagreement that tends to resolve in one direction, fast, once one side capitulates.

Where it meets the Closelooknet frameworks

This sits squarely in the read Closelooknet keeps in Money Temperature: the regime is set by whether capital is leaning risk-on or risk-off, and a tape where equities price calm while oil prices danger is the regime sending mixed messages. The valuation split OnlyFin flags — the US near 25x against China under 10x — is the same valuation gap Closelooknet tracks, and his read that the market has priced a peace that never came is, in framework terms, the market underwriting a soft landing it has not yet been handed. The further records run ahead of the evidence, the more the regime leans on a benign outcome arriving on time.

Closelooknet keeps this as a market-diary observation, not a recommendation — the value is the cross-asset divergence OnlyFin is pointing at, not its specific allocation or any single name.

Worth a Read points you to another writer's published work; the synthesis above, and any errors in it, are Closelooknet's, not the source's. Closelooknet publishes a market diary, not investment advice — circumstances differ; consult a licensed advisor before acting.