C+

Research · Scenario engine

SaaS valuation, decomposed

Every SaaS valuation rests on three components: the cash-flow base it generates (the numerator), the discount rate applied to it (the denominator), and the duration — how many years of high-growth cash flow the market still trusts before fade. Hold two fixed, move the third, and watch the price. Then move them together: the price moves on all three axes at once, and the combined isn't the sum of the parts — each shock lands on a base the others have already moved. That compounding is the second leg.

← Back to the research engine

+0 bps

Denominator. Risk-free rate rises → every future dollar discounts harder.

−0 yrs

The multiplier. Fewer years of trusted growth → terminal value falls hardest.

+0%

Numerator. The cash-flow base itself re-rates up or down.

Fair value vs today +0.0%
Rates+0.0%
Duration+0.0%
Earnings+0.0%
rates +0.0%+ duration +0.0%+ earnings +0.0%+ interaction +0.0%= combined +0.0%

The price moves on all three axes at once — the “multiplicative, not additive” point. The interaction term is the compounding residual: each shock lands on a base the others have already moved, so the combined is the product of the parts, not their sum (and for large simultaneous cuts the parts partly overlap).

Key readings (representative SaaS book)

  • −4.5% — a 25 bps rise in the 10-year, everything else held.
  • −12.5% — a two-year cut to the trusted-growth window, rates and earnings held.
  • −23.0% — +75 bps and a two-year duration cut together.
  • −62.4% — the full "Leg 2: trust 2 years" scenario.
Method. A representative SaaS book priced as a two-stage DCF — 12 years of growth at 14% discounted at 9.5%, then a Gordon terminal. The three sliders shock the discount rate, the trusted-growth window, and the cash-flow base; each reading is the exact change in fair value, alone or combined. Magnitudes are calibrated to the 2022 natural experiment: at this baseline a +425 bps rate shock prints −46.9%, in line with the ~50% the software multiple actually lost. Structure supplies the shape; history supplies the size. This is a sensitivity tool — a diary illustration of how the parts move a price, not a forecast, a valuation of any single name, or investment advice. See the rate backdrop on the Rates X-ray.